In remarks delivered at the 2014 BAA Marketing Law Conference, Jessica Rich, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, confirmed that, when it comes to privacy, the FTC is focusing on mobile technologies in a big way.
This is nothing new—the FTC has brought a number cases in the past couple of years. 2014 was an especially active one, though. For example, the FTC and Apple settled a complaint alleging Apple billed consumers for millions of dollars of charges racked up by children in kids’ mobile apps without first getting parental consent for those purchases. The FTC filed similar complaints against Amazon and Google involving in-app purchases by kids. Google decided to settle with the FTC while Amazon has geared up for a fight.
Earlier in the year, the FTC, the FCC, and certain states reached a $105 million settlement with AT&T involving claims that AT&T unlawfully billed customers for unauthorized third-party charges—also known as mobile “cramming.” The regulators alleged that AT&T billed its customers for subscriptions for ringtones, text alerts, horoscopes, and other services, keeping a portion of the fees from themselves.
And more recently the FTC again went after AT&T, this time for limiting the availability of data in its “unlimited data” plans, a practice known as “throttling.” The agency claims the throttling is unfair and deceptive because AT&T had promised unlimited data, and then reduced data speed without informing its customers.
I’m not saying these things are related, but, with all this negative publicity and enforcement activity, is it any wonder that AT&T was in the news soon after the throttling claims—this time announcing that it had stopped using hidden “supercookies” to track mobile users’ online activity?
The FTC mobile enforcement actions are obviously targeting high-profile companies. But what does it mean for smaller operations?
It means that mobile is a priority for the FTC and is likely to remain so in 2015. Those operating in the mobile space (app providers, developers, marketers, others) should be careful. If you haven’t already, get your privacy policies and practices in order now, on the front end, before any complaints from consumers, state regulators, or the FTC occur. Engaging in “Privacy by Design” now will save you time, energy, and money later if a complaint or enforcement action is initiated.
Add a comment
Archives
- January 2022
- June 2021
- March 2020
- August 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- March 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2006
- February 2006
Recent Posts
- Rethinking Your Cyber Insurance Needs as Your Workplace Evolves
- Data Breach Defense for Educational Institutions
- COVID-19 and the Increased Cybersecurity Risk in a Work-From-Home World
- Like Incorporating Facebook into your Website? EU Decision Raises New Issues
- Lessons Learned: Key Takeaways for Every Business from the Capital One Data Breach
- Will Quick Talks to WRAL About Privacy Issues Related to Doorbell Cameras
- About Us
- Not in My House - California to Regulate IoT Device Security
- Ninth Circuit Says You’re Going to Jail for Visiting That Website without Permission
- Ninth Circuit Interprets “Without Authorization” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Topics
- Data Security
- Data Breach
- Privacy
- Defamation
- Public Records
- Cyberattack
- FCC Matters
- Reporters Privilege
- Political Advertising
- Newsroom Subpoenas
- Shield Laws
- Internet
- Miscellaneous
- Digital Media and Data Privacy Law
- Indecency
- First Amendment
- Anti-SLAPP Statutes
- Fair Report Privilege
- Prior Restraints
- Wiretapping
- Access to Courtrooms
- Education
- FOIA
- HIPAA
- Drone Law
- Access to Court Dockets
- Access to Search Warrants
- Intrusion
- First Amendment Retaliation
- Mobile Privacy
- Newsroom Search Warrants
- About This Blog
- Disclaimer
- Services