On his first full day in office, President Barack Obama issued two memoranda to the heads of executive departments and agencies plainly declaring that government departments and agencies must be open for public scrutiny.
In the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) memorandum, President Obama directs executive departments and agencies to administer FOIA with a presumption in favor of openness.
In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.
The FOIA memorandum further directs agencies to adopt policies in favor of open disclosure and to apply those policies to all decisions involving FOIA. Agencies should not merely react to FOIA requests but, rather, should proactively make information available to the public, including through use of modern technologies. Furthermore, "disclosure should be timely."
The FOIA memorandum also directs the U.S. Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing FOIA to heads of executive departments and agencies and directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) “to update guidance to agencies to increase and improve dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies. . . .” Both the Attorney General’s and OMB’s guidelines are to be published in the Federal Register.
The full text of the FOIA memorandum is linked here.
In addition to the FOIA memorandum, President Obama also issued a memorandum entitled, “Transparency and Open Government.” The transparency memorandum broadly declares the following:
My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.
The transparency memorandum goes on to set out three principles concerning the manner in which government "should" operate, and it states the actions executive departments and agencies should take to further those principles.
- "Government should be transparent." The administration will "take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use." The memorandum states that executive departments and agencies should use new technologies to make information available to the public online and should also ask for public feedback to target the information that is "of the greatest use to the public."
- "Government should be participatory." Because "public engagement enhances the Government's effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions," executive departments and agencies should offer (and ask for public feedback on how to offer) the public more opportunities to participate in policy decisions.
- "Government should be collaborative." The memorandum states that collaboration engages the public in government. To that end, executive departments and agencies should "use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector. Executive departments and agencies should also ask for public feedback on how to better collaborate and how to identify new opportunities for collaboration.
The transparency memorandum directs the Chief Technology Officer, along with the Director of the OMB, within 120 days to coordinate the development of an "Open Government Directive" that "instructs executive departments and agencies to take specific actions implementing the principles" laid out in the transparency memorandum.
The full text of the transparency memorandum is linked here.
It is important to recognize that the principles and guidelines set forth in the FOIA and transparency memoranda are not, in themselves, laws that create new rights of access. Indeed, the memoranda are careful to point this out. However, the memoranda set the tone for the executive branch at the outset of the new Obama Administration. If followed, the memoranda suggest a pointed contrast to prior administrations. For example, some have accused the Bush administration of secrecy and of frustrating FOIA by denying or dragging out requests. Time will tell if FOIA access and openness will improve in the Obama Administration, but the memoranda appear to be a promising first step. A number of prominent newspapers have penned editorials applauding the memoranda, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Seattle Times, and Baltimore Sun.
The memoranda direct specific actions to be taken by certain executive branch officials (e.g., the Director of OMB, the Attorney General, and the Chief Technology Officer), so we should see new agency guidelines concerning FOIA and an Open Government Directive in the future.
Add a comment
Archives
- January 2022
- June 2021
- March 2020
- August 2019
- March 2019
- October 2018
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- March 2014
- July 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2006
- February 2006
Recent Posts
- Rethinking Your Cyber Insurance Needs as Your Workplace Evolves
- Data Breach Defense for Educational Institutions
- COVID-19 and the Increased Cybersecurity Risk in a Work-From-Home World
- Like Incorporating Facebook into your Website? EU Decision Raises New Issues
- Lessons Learned: Key Takeaways for Every Business from the Capital One Data Breach
- Will Quick Talks to WRAL About Privacy Issues Related to Doorbell Cameras
- About Us
- Not in My House - California to Regulate IoT Device Security
- Ninth Circuit Says You’re Going to Jail for Visiting That Website without Permission
- Ninth Circuit Interprets “Without Authorization” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Topics
- Data Security
- Data Breach
- Privacy
- Defamation
- Public Records
- Cyberattack
- FCC Matters
- Reporters Privilege
- Political Advertising
- Newsroom Subpoenas
- Shield Laws
- Internet
- Miscellaneous
- Digital Media and Data Privacy Law
- Indecency
- First Amendment
- Anti-SLAPP Statutes
- Fair Report Privilege
- Prior Restraints
- Wiretapping
- Access to Courtrooms
- Education
- FOIA
- HIPAA
- Drone Law
- Access to Court Dockets
- Access to Search Warrants
- Intrusion
- First Amendment Retaliation
- Mobile Privacy
- Newsroom Search Warrants
- About This Blog
- Disclaimer
- Services